The PET- Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Study

Official Title

The PET-RPS Study: Utility of PET for Assessment of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS)

Summary:

Retroperitoneal sarcoma(RPS) is a rare cancer that is difficult to cure as it typically presents as a very large abdominal mass, and complete removal with clear margins is challenging . This study will focus on improving the outcomes of surgery by treating RPS before surgery, to make resection more effective. The role of chemotherapy as a preoperative treatment for RPS is highly controversial. Response to chemotherapy is unpredictable and if the patient's tumour progresses instead of responding, the window of opportunity for resection will be lost. Conventional cross sectional imaging (CT scan) is inadequate to measure response to chemotherapy until 5-6 cycles have been given, possibly with no improvement. Thus it is critical to develop an earlier and reliable way to assess response. Functional imaging by PET scan is used in other tumour types to identify early response to treatment. PET imaging may provide a more meaningful assessment of RPS response to systemic therapy much earlier in the course of treatment than conventional imaging, allowing timely modification of the treatment plan. This study will define the role of PET imaging in evaluating early response to systemic therapy in high grade RPS, improving patient treatment.

Trial Description

Primary Outcome:

• Correlation of PET imaging with histologic response following preoperative chemotherapy.

Secondary Outcome:

• Correlation of CT imaging with histologic response, and comparing prognostic accuracy of PET-MR vs.CT imaging for histologic response, recurrence status, and survival.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are derived from mesenchymal cells, and can arise at any site. Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) account for

• 15% of STS, and patients have much worse survival outcomes than for extremity STS. Local (abdominal) recurrence of RPS is very common, due to the challenges of obtaining complete resection of these large masses that abut critical central compartment structures, such as the inferior vena cava and aorta. There is currently intense interest in using preoperative therapy to downsize/cytoreduce RPS and hopefully improve oncologic outcomes. Studies have shown that preoperative radiation does not cytoreduce these tumours. In this study, the potential of systemic therapy for cytoreduction will be examined. The standard systemic therapy regimen for treatment of patients with STS remains Adriamycin/Ifosphamide, although side effects can be tolerated only by relatively young and fit patients. The use of this regimen preoperatively for extremity STS results in average response rates of about 30-40%, as judged by histologic assessment of the resected specimen. The international experience with preoperative chemotherapy for RPS is very limited, and there are no published reports. Functional imaging may provide a more meaningful assessment of tumour response to systemic therapy. PET-MR is a newer modality that may hold promise in assessing solid tumour response and its potential utility is currently of rapidly growing interest. Conventional MRI can offer a more detailed assessment of tumour relationships to adjacent structures than can CT, particularly in STS. Integration of PET with MR has the potential to provide information about metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and to help guide surgical planning.There are no data available on the utility of PET-MR in evaluating tumour response to chemotherapy in STS. At present, the role of chemotherapy as a preoperative treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is undefined and controversial. The sarcoma group at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PMCC) has had some experience with this treatment paradigm, but like most sarcoma groups in Ontario, and Canada, has reserved preoperative chemotherapy for frankly unresectable and borderline resectable tumours for which downsizing would potentially render resection more feasible. At present, CT-scan imaging is performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, and if there is no frank progression of the cancer, chemotherapy is continued for another 3-4 cycles. By that point the tumour is smaller on CT scan in about 30% of patients. There are 2 main problems with this approach: 1)70% of the patients may have undergone 5-6 cycles of chemotherapy with no apparent benefit; and 2) there may be a metabolic response and associated benefit without a change in tumour size. The ability to reliably assess tumour response earlier on (i.e. after 1 cycle) would significantly influence the care of these patients as ineffective chemotherapy could be terminated after 1 cycle and the regimen could be modified, or surgery could happen right away before the window of resectability is lost.

View this trial on ClinicalTrials.gov